A fork named douml has been started, and some preliminary code is available here, its forum pages are here.If you want to discuss the original BOUML software, its website is Some forums are also available.I am considering updating the top of this page with something like this: Zeksirina ( talk) 14:55, 10 March 2012 (UTC) Reply Thank you for the note. Current version is only testing as I cannot guarantee that it works correctly. If all goes well the fork should be stable and have some improvements by the beginning of April. ![]() The way I see it - this fork will fix Bruno's rather questionable UI decisions that made workflow kinda similar to operating meat grinder.(too much circular mouse movement) (there are probably ones I have not found yet) This fork has been pretty much dead for a year but I have picked it up at the end of February and by now () I have fixed almost all porting errors. The original may have gone closed-source but we have an(almost) working open source Qt4 fork at : Regards, Comte0 ( talk) 14:48, 17 October 2011 (UTC) Reply As for Gentoo, they moved on to KDE4, which the author refused to support one year before this mess. Daniel Santos ( talk) 09:21, 16 October 2011 (UTC) Reply I don't dispute that, however wikipedia abide by Reliable Sources, and those were hard to find (see the RS noticeboard above). Also, as far as the contested "widely used in universities" statement, I understand wanting an encyclopedia to be accurate, but any software engineering tool of this quality (and no, it's not perfect) that can be obtained on a "student's budget" (if you will) and in a market where there are so few products at it's price that are up to snuff, I think you can rest assured that it is "widely used" if by widely, you mean by at least 20% of universities. :( It was recently removed from the Gentoo repository, I presume because of lack of maintenance, I'm not really sure. BOUML is one of the few open source UML editors that we have and so many of them are so buggy. I've seen pages on software of far lessor importance. Reliable sources were discussed at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_84#BOUML Comte0 ( talk) 19:52, 9 January 2011 (UTC) Reply Wow, sucks to have all this ado over deleting a page about this software.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |